UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒         Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o

Check the appropriate box:

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

MATRIX SERVICE COMPANY
5100 E. Skelly Dr., Ste. 100
Tulsa, OK 74135
PROXY STATEMENT - TABLE OF CONTENTS

MATRIX SERVICE COMPANY
PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on November 5, 2019

This proxy statement, along with a proxy card and our 2019 Annual Report, is first being mailed to stockholders on or about September 26, 2019

SOLICITATION AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES

The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Matrix Service Company (“Matrix”, the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”) for use at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which is scheduled to be held at 9:00 AM, Central Time on November 5, 2019, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Annual Meeting is scheduled to be held at the Company’s corporate headquarters, 5100 E. Skelly Dr., Ste. 100, Tulsa, OK. This proxy statement and accompanying proxy card were first sent on or about September 26, 2019 to stockholders of record on September 20, 2019 (the “Record Date”). The annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 accompanies this proxy statement.

If the accompanying proxy card is properly executed and returned or a stockholder votes his or her proxy by Internet or telephone, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions noted thereon or, if no direction is indicated, those shares will be voted FOR each of the Board’s nominees in respect of Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. In addition, the proxy confers authority on the persons named in the proxy card to vote, in their discretion, on any other matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting. The Board is not currently aware of any other such matters. Any stockholder who has given a proxy, whether by mail, Internet or telephone, has the power to revoke it at any time before it is voted by executing a subsequent proxy and sending it to Justin D. Sheets, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Matrix Service Company, 5100 E. Skelly Dr., Ste. 100, Tulsa, OK 74135, or by a later dated vote by Internet or by telephone. The proxy also may be revoked if the stockholder is present at the meeting and elects to vote in person.

The expenses of this proxy solicitation, including the cost of preparing and mailing this proxy statement and enclosed proxy card, will be borne by the Company. Such expenses will also include the charges and expenses of banks, brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees or fiduciaries for forwarding solicitation materials regarding the Annual Meeting to beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock. In addition to solicitation by mail, certain directors, officers and regular employees of the Company may solicit proxies in person or by telephone, electronic transmission and facsimile transmission. Other than the persons described in this proxy statement, no general class of employee of the Company will be employed to solicit stockholders in connection with this proxy solicitation. However, in the course of their regular duties, employees may be asked to perform clerical or ministerial tasks in furtherance of this solicitation. Any such directors, officers or employees will not be additionally compensated, but may be reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses in connection therewith.

STOCKHOLDERS ENTITLED TO VOTE

At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 27,131,446 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding. Each outstanding share of our common stock is entitled to one vote upon each of the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. There is no cumulative voting with respect to the election of directors. The presence, in person or by proxy, of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the Record Date is required for a quorum for the transaction of business.

If you hold your shares through an account with a bank or broker, the bank or broker may vote your shares on some matters even if you do not provide voting instructions. Brokerage firms have the authority to vote shares on certain matters (such as the ratification of auditors) when their customers do not provide voting instructions. However, on other matters (such as the election of directors), when the brokerage firm has not received voting instructions from its customers, the brokerage firm cannot vote the shares on that matter and a “broker non-vote” occurs. Please note that an uncontested election of directors is no longer considered a routine matter. This means that brokers may not vote your shares on the election of directors if you have not given your broker specific instructions as to how to vote. Please be sure to give specific voting instructions to your broker so that your vote can be counted.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been reached. Votes will be tabulated by an inspector of election appointed by the Board. Abstentions may be specified on all proposals. The following vote is needed in order for the various proposals to be adopted:

Proposal 1 - Election of Directors: The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting is required for the election of directors. This means that the number of shares voted for a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast against that nominee in order to elect that nominee in an uncontested election. With respect to the election of directors, you may vote for or against each nominee. Abstentions do not count as votes for or against the nominee’s election.

Proposal 2 - Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: The appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2020 will be ratified if a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the Annual Meeting vote in favor. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the proposal.

Proposal 3 - Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to our executive officers named in this proxy statement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the proposal.

A “broker non-vote” will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors or Proposals 2 and 3.

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1:
Election of Directors

The Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Second Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that the number of directors on the Board be fixed from time to time by the Board but shall not be less than three nor more than 15 persons. The Board size is currently fixed at seven members. Directors hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company or until their successors have been elected and qualified.

In accordance with the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has unanimously nominated the seven nominees identified below. The Board recommends that you vote “For” the election of its seven nominees. Proxies solicited by the Board will be voted “For” all seven nominees unless stockholders specify otherwise in their proxies.

Each of the Board’s nominees has consented to be named as a nominee in this proxy statement and to serve as a director if elected. If, at the time of the Annual Meeting, any of the nominees is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the discretionary authority provided in the proxies solicited by the Board may be used to vote for a substitute or substitutes who may be recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and whom the Board may propose to replace such nominee. The Board has no reason to believe that any substitute nominee or nominees will be required.

Each of our directors possesses a combination of attributes that qualifies him or her for service on the Board. The directors were specifically recruited for these attributes, which include business experience specifically related to the industries in which we operate, knowledge based on specialized education or training such as accounting, legal and finance, and senior executive management experience that demonstrates leadership qualities and a practical understanding of organizations, processes, business strategies, risk management and how to drive change and growth. We believe that the qualifications, skills and experiences of the directors, individually and collectively, have resulted in the Board being highly effective. The specific skills for each director is listed below:

Board of Directors - Skills Matrix

Nominated Director Biographies

Set forth below is biographical information for each of the Board’s nominees for election as a director at the Annual Meeting, including a summary of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills which led our Board to conclude that the individual should serve on the Board at this time, in light of the Company’s business and structure.

Martha Z. Carnes

Age: 59       Director Since:   July 2017       Committees:       •   Audit (Chairman)       •   Compensation       •   Nominating and        Corporate        Governance

Ms. Carnes retired from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) in June 2016, where she had a thirty-four year career with the firm. She was an assurance partner serving large, publicly traded companies in the energy industry. Ms. Carnes held a number of leadership positions with PwC including the Houston office Managing Partner. She also served as PwC’s Energy and Mining leader in the United States where she led the firm’s energy and mining assurance, tax, and advisory practices. Ms. Carnes also served as one of PwC’s Risk Management Partners and was PwC’s United States representative on the firm’s Global Communities Board. She also serves on the Supervisory Board and is Chairman of the Audit Committee of Core Laboratories N.V., a Netherlands company that provides reservoir description and production enhancement services to the oil and gas industry. Ms. Carnes is also a member of the Governing Board of the Greater Houston Community Foundation and the Board of Trustees at Texas Children’s Hospital. From September 2017 to June 2019, she was a member of the Board of Directors and served on both the audit and conflicts committees of SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC, the general partner of SunCoke Energy Partners LP. Ms. Carnes received her B.B.A. in accounting from the University of Texas at Austin and is a certified public accountant     Skills and Qualifications:     The specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Ms. Carnes should serve as a Director include her extensive expertise in financial oversight, financial reporting and broad accounting knowledge gained from working with and auditing public companies in the energy industry and her operational and leadership experience at PwC.

John D. Chandler

Age: 49       Director Since:   June 2017       Committees:       •   Audit       •   Compensation       •   Nominating and        Corporate        Governance

On August 28, 2017, Mr. Chandler was appointed as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for The Williams Companies, Inc. (“Williams”). Mr. Chandler served as a director for WPZ GP LLC, the general partner of Williams Partners LP, from September 2017 to August 2018 when Williams Partners LP became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Williams. Mr. Chandler previously served as a director and as chairman of the audit committee of USA Compression GP, LLC, the general partner of USA Compression Partners, LP. He also previously served on the board of directors and the audit committee of CONE Midstream GP, LLC, the general partner of CONE Midstream Partners LP, and on the board of directors and audit committee of Green Plains Holdings LLC, the general partner of Green Plains Partners LP. From 2009 until his retirement in March 2014, Mr. Chandler served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Magellan GP, LLC, the general partner of Magellan Midstream Partners, LP. (NYSE:MMP) From 2003 until 2009, he served in the same capacities for the general partner of Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Chandler was Director of Financial Planning and Analysis and Director of Strategic Development for a subsidiary of Williams. From 1992 to 1999, Mr. Chandler held various accounting and finance positions with MAPCO Inc. Mr. Chandler received his B.S. and B.A. in accounting and finance from the University of Tulsa.     Skills and Qualifications:     The specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that Mr. Chandler should serve as a Director include his long history of service in senior corporate leadership positions, his extensive experience in the energy industry, his extensive financial oversight expertise and his understanding of complex financial matters gained from his experience as a CFO of two large publicly traded companies.

John W. Gibson

Age: 67       Director Since:   April 2016       Committees:       •   Audit       •   Compensation        (Chairman)       •   Nominating and        Corporate        Governance

Mr. Gibson is currently the non-executive Chairman of the Board of ONEOK, Inc. Mr. Gibson also served as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., the general partner of ONEOK Partners, L.P., until its merger with a subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. in June 2017. He served as Chief Executive Officer at ONEOK, Inc. from January 1, 2007 to January 31, 2014. He was appointed Chairman of the Board of ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C. in 2007 and of ONEOK, Inc. in May 2011, and served as ONEOK, Inc.’s President from 2010 through 2011. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C. from 2007 until January 31, 2014, and served as President from 2010 through 2011. From 2005 until May 2006, he was President of ONEOK Energy Companies, which included natural gas gathering and processing, natural gas liquids, pipelines and storage and energy services business segments. Prior to that, he was ONEOK, Inc.’s President, Energy from May 2000 to 2005. Mr. Gibson joined ONEOK in May 2000 from Koch Energy, Inc., a subsidiary of Koch Industries, where he was an Executive Vice President. His career in the energy industry began in 1974 as a refinery engineer with Exxon USA. He spent 18 years with Phillips Petroleum Company in a variety of domestic and international positions in its natural gas, natural gas liquids and exploration and production businesses. He holds an engineering degree from Missouri University of Science and Technology, formerly known as the University of Missouri at Rolla. Mr. Gibson also serves as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of ONE Gas, Inc. His service as a member of the board of directors of BOK Financial Corporation ended in December 2017, and he is also a former member of the Board of Trustees of Missouri University of Science and Technology.     Skills and Qualifications:     The specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that Mr. Gibson should serve as a director include his service in a variety of roles of continually increasing responsibility at ONEOK, ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., Koch Energy, Inc., Exxon USA and Phillips Petroleum. In these roles, Mr. Gibson had direct responsibility for and extensive experience in strategic and financial planning, acquisitions and divestitures, operations, management supervision and development, and compliance. As the executive responsible for numerous merger and acquisition transactions over the course of his career, Mr. Gibson has significant experience in assessing acquisition opportunities and in structuring, financing and completing merger and acquisition transactions. Over the course of his long career in a variety of sectors of the oil and gas industry, Mr. Gibson has gained extensive management and operational experience and has demonstrated a strong track record of leadership, strategic vision and risk management.

John R. Hewitt

Age: 61       Director Since:   May 2011

Mr. Hewitt has spent his entire career in the engineering, procurement, and construction industry. Prior to joining Matrix in May 2011, Mr. Hewitt worked for approximately 25 years for various operating businesses of Aker Solutions ASA (“Aker”) and its predecessor companies, which provide engineering and construction services, technology products, and integrated solutions to the energy and process industries worldwide. Up until his appointment with the Company, Mr. Hewitt served as Vice President of Aker Solutions, where he was responsible for providing executive oversight on major capital projects in the power and liquefied natural gas industries. He also served as President, United States Operations at Aker Solutions E&C US, Inc. from 2007 to 2009 where he was responsible for managing all construction services in North America. Prior to that, he served as President of Aker Construction Inc. where he had full profit and loss responsibility for a multi-disciplined direct hire industrial construction business operating throughout North America. Mr. Hewitt holds a finance degree from Stetson University and an engineering degree from the Florida Institute of Technology. Mr. Hewitt is a member of the board of directors of the Tulsa Area United Way, the Tulsa Area Salvation Army, the Philbrook Museum of Art, the Tulsa Area Tourism Improvement District and the Tulsa Boys Home. Mr. Hewitt also serves as an executive board member of the Tulsa Regional Chamber of Commerce.     Skills and Qualifications:     As the current President and CEO of the Company, Mr. Hewitt provides a management representative on the Board with extensive knowledge of day-to-day operations. As a result, he can facilitate the Board’s access to timely and relevant information and its oversight of management’s strategy, planning and performance. In addition, Mr. Hewitt brings to the Board considerable management and leadership experience, extensive knowledge of the energy industry and our business, and significant experience with mergers and acquisitions.

Liane K. Hinrichs

Age: 62       Director Since:   June 2018       Committees:       •   Audit       •   Compensation       •   Nominating and        Corporate        Governance        (Chairman)

Ms. Hinrichs served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for McDermott International, Inc. from October 2008 to August 2017. Previously, she served as McDermott’s Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from January 2007 to September 2008; Corporate Secretary and Associate General Counsel, Corporate Compliance and Transactions from January 2006 to December 2006; Associate General Counsel, Corporate Compliance and Transactions, and Deputy Corporate Secretary from June 2004 to December 2005; Assistant General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Transactions from October 2001 to May 2004; and Senior Counsel from May 1999 to September 2001. Prior to joining McDermott in 1999, she was a partner in a New Orleans law firm. Ms. Hinrichs received a Master of Law in Securities Regulation from Georgetown University Law Center, a J.D. from Tulane School of Law and a B.A. in English from Tulane University.     Skills and Qualifications:     Ms. Hinrichs brings a combination of boardroom experience, executive leadership and general counsel credentials in the engineering and construction industry. Her deep experience and expertise in governance, enterprise risk management, compliance, international issues and strategy ensure advocacy for best practices and contribute to the Board’s deliberations on some of today’s most critical issues.

James H. Miller

Age: 64       Director Since:   May 2014       Committees:       •   Audit       •   Compensation       •   Nominating and        Corporate        Governance

On November 1, 2017, Mr. Miller was appointed as the sole director of Kvaerner U.S. with oversight and fiduciary responsibility for all U.S.-based operations. From June 2011 to October 31, 2017, Mr. Miller was Executive Vice President - Americas of Kvaerner U.S. He also serves on the Board of Directors of San Juan Construction, a privately-owned, multi-disciplined full service general contractor. Mr. Miller has had a consulting agreement with Seajay Consulting L.L.C. since October 2018. From June 2008 through June 2011, Mr. Miller served as Chief Executive Officer & President of Aker Philadelphia Shipyard. From June 2011 to April 2014, Mr. Miller also served as Chairman of the Board for Aker Philadelphia Shipyard ASA (re-named Philly Shipyard ASA in 2015) and re-assumed that position in February 2016. Prior to the shipyard, Mr. Miller was President of Aker Solutions Process & Construction Americas and before that was President of Aker Construction, Inc., which was one of the largest union construction companies in North America. Mr. Miller graduated from the University of Edinboro in Pennsylvania with a Bachelors of Arts degree.     Skills and Qualifications:     Mr. Miller’s extensive progressive leadership positions with a large multi-national industrial construction contractor led to the conclusion that Mr. Miller should serve as a Director. Mr. Miller has significant operational experience and a thorough understanding of the challenges and risks that face industrial construction contractors. He is experienced with merger and acquisition activity, partnering with other companies, and the management of large multi-year construction projects. Mr. Miller is also knowledgeable in many of the Company’s key markets including power generation and iron and steel.

Jim W. Mogg

Age: 70       Director Since:   August 2013       Chairman of the Board

Mr. Mogg has served on the board of directors of ONEOK, Inc., a publicly traded diversified energy company, since July 2007. Mr. Mogg also served as a director of ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., the general partner of ONEOK Partners, L.P., a publicly traded master limited partnership that operated natural gas and natural gas liquids gathering, processing, pipelines, and fractionation assets, from August 2009 until its merger with a subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. in June of 2017. Mr. Mogg served as Chairman of the Board of DCP Midstream GP, LLC, the general partner of DCP Midstream Partners, L.P. (“DCP Midstream”), from August 2005 to April 2007. From January 2004 to September 2006, Mr. Mogg served as Group Vice President, Chief Development Officer and advisor to the Chairman of Duke Energy Corporation. Additionally, Duke Energy affiliates, Crescent Resources and TEPPCO Partners, LP (“TEPPCO”), reported to Mr. Mogg. Mr. Mogg served as President and Chief Executive Officer of DCP Midstream, LLC from December 1994 to March 2000, and as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from April 2000 through December 2003. DCP Midstream was the general partner of TEPPCO and, as a result, Mr. Mogg was Vice Chairman of TEPPCO from April 2000 to May 2002 and Chairman from May 2002 to February 2005. Mr. Mogg also serves on the board of directors of High Point Resources, an exploration and production company, where he is currently the non-executive Chairman.     Skills and Qualifications:     The specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Mr. Mogg should serve as a Director include his long history of service in senior executive leadership positions, including as a chief executive officer and his significant knowledge of the energy industry. Mr. Mogg also brings financial expertise to the Board, including through his previous supervision of principal accounting officers, involvement in financing transactions, and his service on the audit committees of other companies. His current and previous directorships also provide Mr. Mogg with extensive corporate governance experience.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” ALL OF THE ABOVE NAMED NOMINEES FOR ELECTION.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

The Board uses its best efforts to adopt and implement sound corporate governance practices and believes strongly that effective corporate governance practices are an important component of its efforts to focus the entire organization on generating long-term stockholder value through conscientious, safe and ethical operations.

The Board has adopted and implemented Corporate Governance Guidelines and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all of the Company’s directors, officers (including its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and any person performing similar functions) and employees. The Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available on the Corporate Governance page included in the “Investor Relations” section of the Company’s website at matrixservicecompany.com.

Director Independence Guidelines

Pursuant to the applicable rules for companies traded on the NASDAQ Global Market System (“NASDAQ”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Board has adopted director independence guidelines. In accordance with these guidelines, each independent director must be determined to have no relationship with the Company which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The guidelines specify criteria by which the independence of the Company’s directors will be determined, including strict guidelines for directors and their immediate families with respect to past employment or affiliation with the Company or its independent registered public accounting firm.

The Board has affirmatively determined that each of Ms. Carnes, Mr. Chandler, Mr. Gibson, Ms. Hinrichs, Mr. Miller and Mr. Mogg are “independent” under the guidelines. Mr. Hewitt is not considered to be independent because of his current employment as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

The Board also considered Mr. Miller’s familial relationships with the Company. Mr. Miller’s son is an employee of Matrix North American Construction. The Board concluded that this relationship did not impair Mr. Miller’s independence as his son did not hold an executive officer position within Matrix North American Construction and is several levels below the level of executive officer of Matrix.

Additionally, the Company performed two projects totaling $4.7 million for the construction of firewater tanks and related piping in New Jersey for Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, a subsidiary of The Williams Companies, Inc. Mr. Chandler currently serves as CFO of Williams. Although Mr. Chandler is an executive officer of Williams, the Board concluded that this work does not impair his independence because he played no part in negotiating the related contracts and the dollar amount of the work is insignificant to both companies.

The full text of the Company’s director independence guidelines is included in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which is available on the Corporate Governance page included in the “Investor Relations” section of the Company’s website at matrixservicecompany.com.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

The Board has no policy mandating the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. However, as the oversight responsibilities of directors continue to increase, we believe it is beneficial to have an independent chairman whose sole job for the Company is leading the Board. We believe the separation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles provides strong leadership for our Board, while positioning our Chief Executive Officer as the leader of the Company in the eyes of our customers, employees and other stakeholders.

If, in the future, the Chief Executive Officer is serving as Chairman of the Board, then the Board will name a lead director who would, among other specified responsibilities, serve as the leader of the independent directors and facilitate communication between the Chairman/CEO and the other directors.

The Board has six independent members and continues to have one non-independent member, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. A number of our independent Board members have served as members of senior management or as directors of other public companies. Our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are comprised solely of independent directors, each with a different independent director serving as chair of the committee. We believe that the number of independent, experienced directors that make up our Board, along with the independent oversight of the Board by the non-executive Chairman, benefits our Company and our stockholders.

The Audit Committee and full Board jointly oversee the Company’s risk management processes. The Audit Committee receives regular reports from management regarding the Company’s assessment of risks. In addition, the Audit Committee and the full Board focus on the most significant risks facing the Company and the Company’s general risk management strategy, and seek to ensure that risks undertaken by the Company are consistent with the Board’s appetite for risk. While the Board oversees the Company’s risk management, Company management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing our Company and that our Board leadership structure supports this approach.

Meetings and Committees of the Board

The Company’s Board met nine times during fiscal year 2019. The Board has three standing committees – the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of the members of each of the committees qualifies as an “independent director” under the NASDAQ listing standards. During fiscal 2019, each director attended a minimum of 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and of the total number of meetings held by all committees of which he or she was a member.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that each director is expected to attend the annual meetings of stockholders of the Company. All of the members of the Company’s Board attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board in monitoring the integrity of the financial statements of the Company, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm and the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In carrying out these purposes, the Audit Committee, among other things, appoints, evaluates and approves the compensation of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, reviews and approves the scope of the annual audit and the audit fee, pre-approves all auditing services and permitted non-audit services, annually considers the qualifications and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the results of internal audits, compliance with certain of the Company’s written policies and procedures and the adequacy of the Company’s system of internal accounting controls, prepares the Audit Committee report for inclusion in the annual proxy statement and annually reviews the Audit Committee charter and the committee’s performance. The Audit Committee has also established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available on the Corporate Governance page included in the “Investor Relations” section of the Company’s website at matrixservicecompany.com. The Audit Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2019.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee’s functions include reviewing and approving executive salary, Board compensation, short-term and long-term incentive awards, and other benefits. In addition, the Compensation Committee, in conjunction with the Board, reviews the Company’s strategic and financial plans to determine their relationship to the Company’s compensation program. Additional information describing the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for considering and determining executive compensation, including the role of our Chief Executive Officer and consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive compensation, is included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below.

The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter. The Company has made a copy of its Compensation Committee Charter available on the Corporate Governance page included in the “Investor Relations” section of the Company’s website at matrixservicecompany.com. The Compensation Committee held five meetings during fiscal 2019. The Compensation Committee has no authority under its charter to delegate some or all of its authority to subcommittees or other persons and it has no current plans to do so.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee was composed of John D. Chandler, John W. Gibson, James H. Miller, Martha Z. Carnes and Liane K. Hinrichs, all of whom are non-employee directors of the Company. During fiscal 2019, none of the Company’s executive officers served on the Board or on the Compensation Committee of any other entity who had an executive officer that served either on the Company’s Board or on its Compensation Committee.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was established to assist the Board in identifying qualified individuals to become directors of the Company, recommend to the Board qualified director nominees for election by the stockholders or to fill vacancies on the Board, recommend to the Board membership on Board committees, recommend to the Board proposed Corporate Governance Guidelines and report annually to the Board on the status of the CEO succession plan. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter. The Company has made a copy of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter available on the Corporate Governance page included in the “Investor Relations” section of the Company’s website at matrixservicecompany.com. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the authority under its charter to retain a professional search firm to identify candidates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2019.

Director Nomination Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates submitted to it by other directors, employees and stockholders. In evaluating such nominations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability to address the director qualifications discussed below.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly assesses the appropriate size of the Board and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In the event that vacancies are anticipated or otherwise arise, the Committee considers various potential candidates. Candidates may come to the attention of the Committee through current directors, senior management, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons.

Once a prospective nominee has been identified, the Committee makes an initial determination as to whether to conduct a full evaluation of the candidate. The initial determination involves an evaluation of the candidate against the qualifications set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which require broad experience, wisdom, integrity, the ability to make independent analytical inquiries, an understanding of the Company’s business environment and a willingness to devote adequate time to Board duties, including service on no more than four other public company boards.

The Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is a prerequisite for each prospective nominee. Our Board believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of its directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow it to fulfill its responsibilities. The Board also strives to identify candidates with diverse backgrounds. We believe that the judgment and perspectives offered by a diverse Board improves the quality of decision making and enhances the Company’s business performance. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that when searching for new directors, the Committee should actively seek out qualified women and minority candidates as well as candidates with diverse backgrounds, skills and experiences to include in the pool from which Board nominees are chosen.

The Committee also assesses the candidate’s qualifications as an “independent director” under NASDAQ’s current director independence standards and the Company’s director independence guidelines. If the Committee determines that additional consideration is warranted, it may request a professional search firm to gather additional information about the candidate. The Committee designates, after consultation with the CEO, which candidates are to be interviewed. After completing its evaluation, the Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to the persons who should be nominated by the Board and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation of the Committee.

Holders of common stock wishing to recommend a person for consideration as a nominee for election to the Board can do so in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws by giving timely written notice to Justin D. Sheets, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Matrix Service Company, at 5100 E. Skelly Dr., Ste. 100, Tulsa, OK 74135. In order to be considered timely, a stockholder’s notice of proposal must be delivered not later than the close of business on the 90^th day nor earlier than the close of business on the 120^th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120^th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90^th day prior to such annual meeting or if the first public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of such annual meeting, the close of business on the 10^th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company. The written notice should give each such nominee’s name, address, appropriate biographical information, a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder (and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made) and each such nominee and/or any other person or persons (naming such person or persons), relating to such nominee’s service on the Board, if elected, as well as any other information that would be required in a proxy statement. Any such recommendation should be accompanied by a written statement from the person recommended, giving his or her consent to be named as a nominee and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director. The

written notice should also be accompanied by a completed director nominee questionnaire in the form required by the Company and a completed and signed written representation and agreement (executed by the nominee in the form provided by the Secretary of the Company upon written request) that such person:

The written notice must also set forth, as to the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made:

The above summary may not contain all of the information about our stockholder nomination process. You are encouraged to read our Bylaws carefully for further details, which can be found in our public filings.

Executive Sessions

Executive sessions of the Board are held periodically. The sessions are chaired by the independent, non-executive Chairman of the Board. Any non-management director may request that an additional executive session be scheduled. Executive sessions of the independent directors are held on an as-needed basis, but at least quarterly.

Communications with the Board

The Board provides a process by which stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board or any of the directors. Stockholders and other interested parties may send written communications to the Board or any of the directors at the following address: Board of Matrix Service Company c/o Matrix Service Company, 5100 E. Skelly Dr., Ste. 100, Tulsa, OK 74135. Stockholders and other interested parties may also contact the Board or any of the directors via the Company’s online submission form by clicking on the “Contact the Board” link included on the Corporate Governance page included in the “Investor Relations” section of the Company’s website at matrixservicecompany.com. All communications will be compiled by the Company’s Corporate Secretary and submitted to the Board or the individual director on a periodic basis.

Equity Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors

The Company’s Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors, which were revised in August 2014 and confirmed in November 2017, require each non-employee director to own a number shares of our common stock equal in value to five times the annual cash retainer. For purposes of determining compliance with the guideline, the cash retainer does not include fees earned as Chairman of the Board or as Chairman of the Audit, Compensation or Nominating and Corporate Governance committees. The following types of equity can be used to satisfy the stock ownership requirements:

Existing directors have five years from the August 2014 date of adoption or revision of the guidelines to attain this level of ownership. Directors elected or appointed after the date of the adoption of the Stock Ownership Guidelines will have five years from the date of their election or appointment to the Board to attain this level of ownership. Furthermore, once the guidelines are met, the directors will remain in compliance with the Stock Ownership Guidelines if a drop in the Company’s stock price causes the director’s ownership level to drop below five times the annual retainer so long as the director has not sold any shares subsequent to passing the ownership test. Messrs. Mogg and Miller currently satisfy the requirements. Mr. John W. Gibson, who was appointed in April 2016, Mr. John D. Chandler, who was

appointed in June 2017, Ms. Martha Z. Carnes, who was appointed in July 2017, and Ms. Liane K. Hinrichs, who was appointed in June 2018, do not currently satisfy the Stock Ownership Guidelines requirements; however, each is still within the initial five-year accumulation period.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

General

Management directors receive no additional compensation for their service on the Board or any committee thereof. Directors of the Company are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.

The elements of our non-employee director compensation consist of cash and equity. Our objective in establishing director compensation is to position ourselves to attract and retain individuals who have relevant business and leadership backgrounds and experience by providing a competitive package of cash and equity compensation.

Total compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors is determined in a manner similar to that for executives, which is described under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) engages a third party compensation consultant to periodically review director compensation and make recommendations. The Committee reviews comparative data from the outside consultant and makes recommendations regarding director compensation to the full Board for approval.

Director compensation is generally reviewed on a bi-annual basis. It was last reviewed in November 2017 when the Committee engaged a third party compensation consultant, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), to conduct a market study of director compensation. Meridian obtained comparative data using published compensation surveys and proxy analysis of selected companies similar in size, location and industry. The companies included in the survey are consistent with those that we use to review executive compensation.

The overall conclusions of the consultant were that the compensation structure of the Board was aligned with peer practices and that the annual value of compensation approximated the median of the identified peer group of companies. Upon careful consideration of the consultant’s recommendations, peer practices and the Company’s stated compensation objectives, the Committee approved the following, which remained in effect for fiscal 2019:

We also provide a Deferred Fee Plan for Members of the Board of Directors of Matrix Service Company (the “Deferred Fee Plan”), which allows our non-employee directors to defer all or a portion of their cash compensation with interest. The effective interest rate for the subsequent calendar year is researched and approved by the Committee at a regularly-scheduled meeting, the most recent of which took place on October 30, 2018. At that meeting, the Committee approved an increase in the average interest rate from 5.0% to 6.25% for the 2019 calendar year. Non-employee directors are also permitted to invest their cash retainer in Company common stock through the Company’s 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). Investment through the ESPP is limited to $60,000 per director per calendar year.

Director Compensation

The compensation earned by each of our non-employee directors in fiscal 2019 is summarized in the table below:

AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

Report of the Audit Committee of the Board

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls, on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the associated system of internal controls. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards and to issue a report thereon. The Audit Committee monitors these processes. The Audit Committee’s role does not provide any special assurance with regard to the Company’s financial statements, nor does it involve a professional evaluation of the quality of the audits performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:

Based on the reviews and discussions above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee, subject to ratification by the stockholders, has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending June 30, 2020.

The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter. The Board of Directors has determined that the members of the Audit Committee are independent and financially literate as defined by the applicable standards. The Board has also determined that Martha Z. Carnes, John W. Gibson and John D. Chandler qualify as financial experts as defined by the SEC rules adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Members of the Audit Committee:

Martha Z. Carnes, Audit Committee Chairman
James H. Miller, Audit Committee Member
John W. Gibson, Audit Committee Member
John D. Chandler, Audit Committee Member
Liane K. Hinrichs, Audit Committee Member

Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Fees billed for audit services in fiscal 2019 and 2018 include fees associated with the annual audit, the reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, the audit of our internal controls, and services performed in connection with other filings with the SEC.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm on a periodic basis up to a specified dollar amount in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. If the dollar amount of any anticipated services is expected to exceed the predetermined limit, pre-approval of the Audit Committee is required.

PROPOSAL NUMBER 2:
Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee of the Board of the Company has been charged with the exclusive power and authority to engage or terminate the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee of the Board has engaged the firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020. Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as independent auditors for the Company since January 2006.

A proposal will be presented at the Annual Meeting asking the stockholders to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment.

A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if he or she desires to do so, and to respond to appropriate questions from those attending the meeting.

The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required for the adoption of this proposal. The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “For” ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP’s engagement.

EXECUTIVE OFFICER INFORMATION

Executive Officer Biographies

In addition to Mr. Hewitt, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, who serves on the Board and whose biographical information is set forth under the caption, “Nominated Director Biographies,” the executive officers of the Company are:

Joseph F. Montalbano, age 70, has served as Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since May 2008. In August of 2019, Mr. Montalbano notified the Company of his intent to retire on June 30, 2020. From 2002 to 2008, Mr. Montalbano served as Senior Vice President – Senior Project Director Energy Sector of Black & Veatch, where he was responsible for all construction projects under his direction. Prior to working at Black & Veatch, from 1972 to 2002, Mr. Montalbano served numerous project management roles with a national construction firm serving the energy sector. Mr. Montalbano holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering and a Masters of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn. He earned a Masters in Business Administration degree from New York Institute of Technology and is registered as a Professional Engineer in multiple states. Mr. Montalbano also served on the Board of the Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa from September 2014 to September 2018.

Kevin S. Cavanah, age 54, has served as Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer since December 2010 and as Treasurer since December 2013. Mr. Cavanah also served as Secretary for the Company from December 2010 to October 2018. Mr. Cavanah served as Vice President, Accounting and Financial Reporting for the Company from August 2007 to December 2010 and as Controller from April 2003 to December 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cavanah served as an Accounting Manager for Williams Communications from 2001 to 2003 and as an Accounting Manager for The Williams Companies, Inc. from 1998 to 2001. Prior to joining The Williams Companies, Inc., Mr. Cavanah served as an Audit Manager for Ernst & Young, LLP. Mr. Cavanah has a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration degree in Accounting from the University of Arkansas. Mr. Cavanah also serves on the Board of the Tulsa Area United Way as well as its Finance and Audit Committee.

Alan R. Updyke, age 59, has served as President of Operations since September 2019. He was President of Matrix Service Inc., one of the Company’s principal operating subsidiaries, from February 2018 to September 2019. He previously served as Senior Vice President, Operations for Matrix Service Inc. from September 2014 to January 2018. Prior to that, he served as Vice President of Construction for Matrix Service Inc. from July 2012 to August 2014. Before joining Matrix Service Inc., Mr. Updyke spent 17 years with Brinderson in various roles, most recently as President of their Western Operations. In that role, Mr. Updyke was responsible for providing strategic leadership and management direction to four regional offices and all major capital construction projects. Previous to that, Mr. Updyke was the General Manager of Turner Industries West Coast Operations.

Jason W. Turner, age 48, has served as President, Matrix North American Construction, one of the Company’s principal operating subsidiaries, since December 2013. He previously served as Vice President, Corporate Development and Treasurer for Matrix Service Company from August of 2012 to December 2013 and as Vice President and Treasurer from May 2010 to August 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Turner served as Director of Finance for Matrix Service Company from March 2006 to May 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Turner served as Vice President Credit Products Officer for Bank of America. From May 1996 to February 2005, Mr. Turner held various positions with Gemstar-TV Guide including Vice President of Finance for TV Guide Networks. Prior to 1996, Mr. Turner worked for the Federal Reserve Bank and in commercial banking. Mr. Turner has a Bachelor of Science Degree in Finance from Oklahoma State University and an MBA from the University of Tulsa.

Nancy E. Austin, age 52, has served as Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer for the Company since October 2018. She previously served as Vice President, Strategic Services and Administration from August 2016 to October 2018 and as Vice President, Human Resources from January 2006 to August 2016. Prior to that, Mrs. Austin served as Director of Human Resources from September 2000 to January 2006. Prior to joining the Company, Mrs. Austin worked for TV Guide, Samson Resources and Villareal & Associates specializing in human resource management, employee relations, and consulting. Mrs. Austin holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Political Science from Oklahoma State University and is a certified

Professional in Human Resources. She is also a member of the Society for Human Resource Management and World-at-Work. Mrs. Austin serves on the Board of the Northeast Oklahoma Chapter of American Red Cross, and she also serves on the Board of the Girl Scouts of Eastern Oklahoma.

Rick J. Bennett, age 54, joined the Company as Vice President and Chief Information Officer in October 2014. Prior to joining Matrix, Mr. Bennett served ten years as the Chief Information Officer at T.D. Williamson based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Prior to that, he held leadership positions in information technology at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oklahoma, Blakely Crop Hail Insurance, National Farmers Organization, Taylor Ball Construction Management and The Principal Financial Group. Mr. Bennett holds an Executive Certificate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Sloan School of Management, a Bachelor of Business degree with emphasis in Management Information Systems from Western Illinois University, and completed a Masters of Energy Business degree at the University of Tulsa in May 2018. Early in his career he served in the United States Navy as an Interior Communications Electrician. Mr. Bennett serves on the Tulsa Region Board of Junior Achievement of Oklahoma, and he also serves on the Advisory Board of 501tech.

Justin D. Sheets, age 41, has served as Vice President and General Counsel since September 2019, Secretary for the Company since October of 2018 and the Corporate Compliance Officer since September of 2015. From October 2014 to September 2019, he was Vice President, Legal and Risk Management. From July 2013 to October 2014, Mr. Sheets served as Senior Director, Legal and Risk Management. Between November 2011 and July of 2013, Mr. Sheets served as Director, Risk Management and from June 2010 until November of 2011, Mr. Sheets served as Staff Counsel. Mr. Sheets began his career with Matrix Service Company in 2002. From 2002 to 2008 and since 2010, Mr. Sheets served in various capacities of increasing responsibility. Mr. Sheets provided consulting services to the Company between 2008 and 2010 while he also consulted with Conway, McKenzie and Dunleavy representing construction clients with a primary focus on mergers and acquisitions, restructuring and liquidations. Mr. Sheets holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Environmental Health and Safety Sciences from Indiana State University and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Tulsa and is licensed to practice law in the State of New Jersey. Mr. Sheets has also served on the Board of Family & Children’s Services since 2016.

Bradley J. Rinehart, age 55, has served as President, Matrix Service Inc. since September 2019. He served as President, Matrix PDM Engineering from December 2016 to September 2019. He previously served as Vice President, Matrix Service Inc. from May 1997 to December 2016, Regional Manager for the Michigan Tank Construction Region (“Michigan Region”) from 1991 to May 1997, Operations Manager of the Michigan Region from 1990 to 1991, and as a project manager in the Michigan Region from 1988 to 1989. Mr. Rinehart holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Construction Science from the University of Oklahoma. Mr Rinehart has also served on the Board of the Parkinson Foundation of Oklahoma since 2016.

Glyn A. Rodgers, age 61, has served as President, Matrix PDM Engineering since September 2019. He previously served as Vice President of Business Development for Matrix Service Inc. from January 2018 to September 2019. Prior to joining Matrix, he served as President for IHI E&C International Corporation from 2012 to 2016, President for Kvaerner Houston EPC Center from 2010 to 2012, President for Aker Solutions US Inc. from 2007 to 2010, President for Aker Solutions Facility Services from 2004 to 2007 and Vice President for Aker Plant Services Group Inc. from 2002 to 2004.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains our compensation philosophy, objectives and practices in place for our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and our other named executive officers (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) during fiscal 2019. Compensation for our Named Executive Officers is determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) and is supported by market data and advice from an independent compensation consultant retained by the Committee, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”).

In fiscal 2019, the Company’s Named Executive Officers continued to be the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the presidents of the Company’s two largest operating companies.

Summarized below are the highlights of key decisions and actions taken regarding the compensation of our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2019. These actions were approved by the Committee with advice from Meridian and are consistent with our stated compensation philosophy.

The following graphs illustrate the allocation of the fiscal 2019 target compensation opportunity for our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hewitt, and the weighted average of our other Named Executive Officers:

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

We are focused on building and maintaining a sustainable business model that consistently delivers superior returns to our stockholders. To be successful, we must attract, retain and motivate key talent to provide the needed leadership capabilities to develop and execute our business strategy. Our compensation philosophy and approach is designed to support these objectives.

Our compensation philosophy is to provide the opportunity for outstanding compensation when superior performance is demonstrated. This pay-for-performance philosophy is reflected in each aspect of the compensation package for executive officers and other management team members. All components of compensation for executive officers and key management are reviewed periodically to ensure consistency with our compensation philosophy and to verify that the overall level of compensation is competitive. We use the following principles in the design and administration of our executive compensation program:

Our executive compensation program is administered by the Committee. The role of the Committee is to provide oversight and direction to ensure the establishment of executive compensation programs that are competitive in nature, enable us to attract and retain top talent, and align the interests of our executive officers with our stockholders.

The Committee is supported by our Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer in the design, review and administration of our executive compensation programs. The Committee engaged Meridian to evaluate executive officer compensation and Company practices in relation to other companies and to provide associated recommendations.

The CEO considers all relevant information and provides recommendations to the Committee regarding compensation for review, discussion and approval for all executive officers with the exception of himself. The Committee establishes CEO compensation. The Committee reviews the performance and approves the compensation of the executive officers based on the CEO’s recommendations, and then reviews the performance and establishes appropriate compensation for the CEO in executive session without the CEO present.

In implementing our compensation philosophy, the Committee also compares our CEO’s total compensation to the total compensation of the other Named Executive Officers. However, the Committee has not established a targeted level of difference between the total compensation of the CEO and the median total compensation level for the next lower tier of management. The Committee also considers internal pay equity among the other Named Executive Officers, and in relation to the next lower tier of management, in order to maintain compensation levels that are consistent with the individual contributions and responsibilities of those officers.

Committee Consideration of the 2018 Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation

We conducted our advisory vote on executive compensation last year at our 2018 annual meeting. While this vote was not binding on us, we believe that it is important for our stockholders to have an opportunity to vote on this proposal on an annual basis as a means of expressing their views regarding our executive compensation philosophy, our compensation policies and programs, and our decisions regarding executive compensation, all as disclosed in our proxy statement. The Committee values the opinions of our stockholders and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns, and the Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.

The Committee has reviewed the voting results from the advisory vote on executive compensation (commonly known as a say-on-pay proposal) conducted at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. At that meeting, nearly 98% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal were in favor of our Named Executive Officers’ compensation as disclosed in our proxy statement. The Committee determined that, given the high level of support, no changes to our executive compensation policies and decisions were necessary based on last year’s voting results. The Committee intends to continue making executive compensation decisions with a focus on aligning pay with performance and promoting stockholder value.

Key Elements of Executive Compensation

The primary elements of our executive compensation program include:

The Compensation Committee engages a compensation consultant on a bi-annual basis to ensure that the Company’s compensation package is consistent with that of its competitors. The Committee engaged Meridian in fiscal 2019 to evaluate the elements of target compensation and the appropriate mix of compensation programs. Meridian was engaged exclusively by the Committee and does not provide other services to the Company or senior management. The Committee has assessed the independence of Meridian pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that Meridian’s work for the Committee does not raise any conflict of interest.

The Committee evaluated the competitiveness of the compensation package offered to our executives in both form and structure. Meridian’s fiscal 2019 executive compensation practices analysis included a review of general industry survey data and of proxy information and other public filings for the following companies:

Base Salary

Base salary is the foundation of our executive compensation package. Our practice in establishing executive base salary, and that for other managers and employees, is to determine the market median, or “50^th percentile”, among comparable companies. This data was provided by Meridian. Base salary is then established based on the Named Executive Officer’s responsibilities, role in the organization, level and type of work experience, and individual and business performance. We expect to continue to engage a compensation consultant to review and provide competitive market pay data on no less than a bi-annual basis.

We utilize a market-based job evaluation system to establish and ensure equitable, competitive pay levels throughout the organization. Salary grades and ranges are established by evaluating positions based on the external market data and internal equity. Most of our employees, including the Named Executive Officers, are assigned to a salary grade. Broad ranges of salary are associated with each grade and are based on market data.

Base salary and salary grade also play a factor in determining other short- and long-term incentive compensation awards. Short-and long-term target incentive awards are set at a percentage of base salary.

Consistent with the Committee’s normal practice of reviewing executive compensation, Meridian’s observations and recommendations regarding the competitiveness of executive compensation were presented to the Committee at the August 2018 meeting. The Committee approved salary adjustments, which were based on the Company’s compensation philosophy of competitiveness and individual and business performance and in recognition that no base salary increases were made in the prior fiscal year. The Committee’s decisions are discussed below:

his base salary relative to our peer companies, Mr. Hewitt recommended a base salary increase of 9.4%, or $40,852. The Committee approved Mr. Hewitt’s recommendation, and Mr. Cavanah’s base salary was increased from $434,148 to $475,000 effective September 1, 2018.

Annual/Short-Term Incentive Compensation

Our annual/short-term incentive compensation plan is designed to offer the opportunity for substantial annual cash incentive awards for delivering outstanding performance. Rewards under our short-term incentive compensation plan are based on overall company, business unit and individual performance, as compared to pre-established objectives that are tied to enhancement of stockholder value. Our short-term incentive compensation objectives are designed to:

The base calculation of incentives is generally tied to objective measures for financial and safety performance. Incentives for executive officers other than the CEO in the form of targeted percentages of base salary are recommended by the CEO and reviewed and approved by the Committee, which is free to reject or revise the CEO’s recommendations. The targeted incentive compensation percentage of base salary for the CEO is determined solely by the Committee in executive session, without the CEO present.

For fiscal 2019, the Committee approved the following key provisions of the annual/short-term incentive compensation plan:

Incentive targets and actual performance for the Named Executive Officers are as follows:

In fiscal 2019, we achieved a consolidated TRIR of 0.59 while Matrix North American Construction (“MNAC”) and Matrix Service Inc. (“MSI”) achieved a TRIR of 0.93 and 0.33, respectively. Based on these results, Messrs. Hewitt, Montalbano and Cavanah earned safety incentives of between threshold and target, Mr. Turner did not earn a safety incentive, and Mr. Updyke earned the maximum safety incentive.

Based on these results, Messrs. Hewitt, Montalbano, Cavanah and Turner earned financial incentives of between threshold and target while Mr. Updyke earned financial incentives of between target and maximum.

Details of the calculated incentives for each NEO, which were approved by the Committee at the August 2019 Compensation Committee Meeting, are as follows:

Performance measures are established shortly after the beginning of the fiscal year and do not include the impact of any acquisitions, positive or negative, completed within the fiscal year. However, it is anticipated that the Committee would evaluate any acquisitions which may be completed during the fiscal year on a case-by-case basis to determine their impact on the plan and adjust performance measures appropriately. In addition, the Committee has negative discretion with respect to actual payout of annual short term incentive awards and can reduce awards regardless of whether performance targets are achieved.

The Annual/Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan is reviewed and evaluated periodically to ensure that it meets our objectives and may be modified, discontinued or replaced based on our changing objectives and requirements.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The purpose for providing long-term incentive compensation to executive officers is to tie executive rewards directly to the enhancement of long-term stockholder value and Company profitability. Offering the opportunity for executive officers and other key members of management to earn an ownership position in the Company along with a long-term cash incentive enables us to remain competitive and attract, retain and motivate top executive and management talent. We believe that long-term incentive

awards help to create and maintain a long-term perspective among executive officers and provide a direct link between executive compensation and our long-term growth and profitability. However, we also understand that equity awards create dilution in our earnings per share and therefore, believe that a portion of our long-term incentive compensation should be in the form of cash.

The Committee believes that a combination of service-based RSUs and performance units are the most appropriate forms of equity awards to achieve our stated objectives. RSUs strongly and directly link management and stockholder interests. As a full value award, RSUs are less dilutive to stockholders than stock options, since we are able to issue fewer shares in order to attain the desired level of equity compensation for our executive officers and managers. Under the long-term incentive program, all awards are issued on an annual basis. A portion of the annual award is in the form of service-based RSUs that vest over a specified period of time. Service-based shares are an excellent tool to promote executive officer and management retention. The second portion of the award is in the form of performance units with performance criteria that link the realized value of the equity reward to achievement of stockholder value. Finally, the remaining portion of the award is cash-based and includes performance incentives tied to achievement of important strategic goals. Specific, individual grants vary by level and role in the organization. The amount of each award corresponds to the respective salary grade for each executive officer and manager and is based on market data.

Long-term incentive awards are reviewed and evaluated periodically to ensure that they continue to meet our objectives and may be modified, discontinued or replaced based on the changing objectives and requirements of the Company. The Committee reviewed the long-term incentive plan in August 2018 in connection with the grant of fiscal 2019 long-term incentive awards and recommended no significant changes. The Committee’s review carefully considered the Meridian study, trends of our peer companies, compensation objectives of retention and value creation, and the objective of conserving shares available for grant under our equity incentive plan and reducing earnings dilution.

The Committee approved the following structure for the fiscal 2019 long-term incentive grant for NEOs:

In the event the Company achieves a relative TSR in excess of the 75^th percentile but the actual TSR of the Company is less than zero, the Named Executive Officers will receive 1.5 shares for each performance unit.

The peer group for the fiscal 2019 performance unit award was as follows:

Grants made during fiscal 2019 to our Named Executive Officers are shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table under the caption “Executive Officer Compensation”.

Perquisites and Other Benefits

Our executive officers do not receive significant compensation in the form of perquisites or supplemental benefits. In general, our executive officers are eligible to participate in the same retirement and health and welfare plans as all of our other eligible employees. We offer the following benefits to executive officers.

In addition to the company-provided life insurance policies described above, all executive officers, along with other eligible employees and managers, have the option to purchase supplemental life insurance for themselves, their spouses and dependents.

Change of Control/Severance Agreements

We have entered into Change of Control/Severance Agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers. These agreements are designed to promote stability, continuity and focus for key members of leadership during periods of uncertainty that may be created by change of control situations. Additionally, the use of such agreements is a competitive practice that enhances our ability to attract and retain leadership talent. For further details regarding our Change of Control/Severance Agreements, see the discussion under the caption “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Clawback Policy

Consistent with the principles of responsible oversight, the Company’s Board has adopted a clawback policy, and the Company’s equity award agreements also include a clawback provision. The clawback policy provides that, to the extent permitted by law, if the Board, with the recommendation of the Committee, determines that:

we will seek to recover from the executive officer such compensation, in whole or in part, as we deem appropriate under the circumstances. The Board has sole discretion in determining whether an officer’s conduct has or has not met any particular standard of conduct under law or Company policy.

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was signed into law on July 21, 2010, the SEC was directed to issue rules requiring the national securities exchanges to amend their listing standards to require listed companies to adopt mandatory clawback policies. The Company anticipates that it will modify its clawback policy to conform to the requirements of any such rules or listing requirements upon their adoption.

Policy on Hedging and Pledging of Company Securities

Hedging transactions may permit a director, officer or employee to continue to own our securities obtained through employee benefit plans or otherwise, but without the full risks and rewards of ownership. When that occurs, the director, officer or employee may no longer have the same objectives as our other stockholders. Our Insider Trading Policy specifically prohibits our directors, Named Executive Officers and other employees from purchasing any securities or other financial instruments or engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or that are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the value of any equity securities of the Company that are held by any such person, directly or indirectly. This hedging policy also applies to family members and entities controlled by our directors, Named Executive Officers and other employees.

Securities held in a margin account as collateral for a margin loan may be sold by the broker without the customer’s consent if the customer fails to meet a margin call. Similarly, securities pledged as collateral for a loan may be sold in foreclosure if the borrower defaults on the loan. Because a margin sale or foreclosure sale may occur at a time when the pledgor is aware of material non-public information or otherwise is not permitted to trade in the Company’s securities, our Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors, Named Executive Officers and other employees from holding our securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging our securities.

Compensation Program as it Relates to Risk

We have reviewed our compensation policies and practices for both executives and non-executives as they relate to risk and have determined that they are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In reaching this conclusion, we considered the various elements of our compensation program that are designed to help mitigate excessive risk taking, including:

Our compensation program is designed to motivate our Named Executive Officers and other Company officers to achieve business objectives that generate strong stockholder returns and to encourage ethical behaviors.

Equity Ownership Guidelines

The Board believes that our executive officers should demonstrate their commitment to, and belief in, the Company’s long-term profitability. Stock ownership more closely aligns our executive officers’ interests and actions with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. Accordingly, each officer is expected to maintain a significant investment in the Company through the ownership of our common stock. See the discussion under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management—Equity Ownership Guidelines” for a description of our guidelines.

Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board

The Compensation Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Members of the Compensation Committee:

John W. Gibson, Chairman
James H. Miller, Member
John D. Chandler, Member
Martha Z. Carnes, Member
Liane K. Hinrichs, Member

EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The following tables set forth certain information regarding compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and each of the Company’s three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at June 30, 2019 for services in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries. The executive officers listed below are referred to collectively as the Named Executive Officers, or “NEOs”.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information with respect to the total compensation of the Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017:

Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal 2019

The following table sets forth information with respect to grants of plan-based awards in fiscal 2019 to the Named Executive Officers:

payout can range from 0% to 150% of the target payout and will be based on average Return on Invested Capital for fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020. Actual payouts for the applicable fiscal year are reported in the Summary Compensation Table as a portion of the amount shown under the column “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2019

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of June 30, 2019:

The stock awards vest according to the following schedule: